Curriculum without Borders: Transdisciplinary, Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Teaching in Higher Education
Editors: Rubby Dhunpath and Nyna Amin
Whilst scholars have theorised and practiced higher education curriculum without disturbing its insidious interior and outcomes, the students (those who have been accused of being uncritical thinkers) have detected its weaknesses and limitations and highlighted these through protest actions that have shaken the foundations of disciplines and the material foundations of higher education infrastructures.
The recent publication, “Disrupting Higher Education Curriculum: Undoing Cognitive Damage” (Samuel, Dhunpath & Amin, 2016) and the decolonise the curriculum fallist movement, provide a spectrum of ideas on how cognitive damage is activated through the processes of formal and informal learning underpinned by the curriculum choices we make. Undoing cognitive damage, as captured in the writings of authors in that volume such as Gayatri Spivak, Thabo Msibi, William Pinar and others point to curriculum work as a complicated and time-consuming endeavour: it requires unmasking the hidden assumptions, stereotypical beliefs, imported worldviews, inappropriate and irrelevant content, and most importantly, discovering the ways in which curriculum designers and implementers are complicit actors of cognitive damage.
A curriculum border Amin (2016) writes, restricts and circumscribes “with prescribed objectives, content, practices, activities and assessments for narrow regulatory purposes (passing a module or acquiring a qualification). Power, vested stakes and hegemony are exercised in higher education through curricula design and choices, which are imposed on students. It is often an inward looking (at the prescribed content, objectives and outcomes), decontextualised, ahistorical and perhaps, irrelevant preparation for post institutional intents”.
A curriculum without borders approach, she argues, is an opportunity to redefine a branch of learning by opening its perimeters to disruptive, contradictory and complementary ideas and thought. It is at the intersection of disciplines that creative leaps can be made; it is the cross pollination of disciplines that generate new concepts, enabling revision and the production of relevant and appropriate knowledge. Curriculum, we know “is the manifestation of the power distribution in society” (Lau, 2001, p. 29). Moving beyond the boundaries of disciplines provides the freedom for epistemic disobedience and resistance.
For the editors of this special edition, without borders is a useful trope for contemporary curriculum work aligned to revisionist endeavours, expanding possibilities, introspecting existing practices and conjuring future curricula interpretations and implementation. This special edition invites submissions on disruptive shifts to re/vitalise higher education curricula. It implores critical interrogation into whether already enacted alternative curriculum interventions have indeed assisted to undo cognitive damage in higher education. Have the curriculum disruptions enabled re-defining who we as academic producers of knowledge are and who we want to become as knowledge activators in and through our curricula?
We call on curriculum theorists, analysts, practitioners and all who have been immersed in curriculum work to share their explorations, experiences, experiments, case studies, theorisations and constructive methodologies. We are keen to gain insights into successful and not so successful adventures in curriculum change and transformation, which provide the philosophical and pragmatic terrain to re-imagine and posit future directions in higher education curricula.
1. Final Date for submission of manuscripts for the peer-review process is 15 February, 2019.
2. Papers must be submitted in English, in Microsoft Word format, Times New Roman, 11 font.
3. Each article must follow the Alternation/ Harvard style of in-text referencing with a full reference list of bibliographical information of sources, at the end of the manuscript. Please use the Alternation style for article submissions. Cf. Guidelines for Authors at: http://alternation.ukzn.ac.za/submissions.aspx.
4. Only complete manuscripts of between 6000 to 8000 words, free of grammatical errors, will be accepted for the peer-review process, although longer articles may be considered.
5. Papers must be original and not published, or submitted for publication, elsewhere.
6. Accepted papers will be subject to DOUBLE BLIND PEER REVIEW. The review process takes at least 6 months to complete. Authors will be informed of the editors’ final decision on receipt of all the reviewers’ reports. The Editor in Chief will make the final decision to accept papers for publication.
7. If accepted for publication, authors will be required to submit a formal letter of declaration from a language editor that accepted manuscripts have been subject to a professional language edit.
8. The DHET Condition applies: “At least 75% of contributions published in the journal must emanate from multiple institutions” (DHET Research Outputs Policy, 2015).
Submit manuscripts with the title line: 2019 UTLO- Alternation Special Edition to:
Tel: 031 260 3002
1. Dr Rubby Dhunpath Dhunpath@ukzn.ac.za; Tel: 031-260 2622
2. Prof Nyna Amin: Amin@ukzn.ac.za Tel. 031-260 7255
Alternation is a fully accredited, peer-reviewed South African Department of Higher Education and Training journal. Articles that pass the review process, and that are accepted for publication, will be published online, at: http://alternation.ukzn.ac.za/archive.aspx
Guidelines for Contributors, and Alternation Style
Manuscripts must be submitted in English (UK). If quotations from other languages appear in the manuscript, place the original in a footnote and a dynamic-equivalent translation in the body of the text or both in the text.
Contributors must submit one computer-generated copy of the manuscript to the editor(s). The computer-generated copy must be in Word for Windows, and must have an Abstract and Keywords. It must also be submitted in the Alternation style.
Manuscripts should range between 5000-10000 words and book reviews between 800-1200 words. However, longer articles may be considered for publication.
Attach a cover page containing the following information: The corresponding author's full name, address, e-mail address, position, department, university/ institution, and telephone/ fax numbers. A brief summary of the biodata of all authors must be attached.
Maps, diagrams and posters must be presented in print-ready form. Clear black and white or colour digitised photos (postcard size) or diagrams in pdf or jpeg may also be submitted.
Use footnotes sparingly. In order to enhance the value of the interaction between notes and text, we use footnotes and not endnotes.
Authors may use their own numbering systems in the manuscript.
Except for bibliographical references, abbreviations must include full-stops. The abbreviations (e.a.) = 'emphasis added'; (e.i.o.) = 'emphasis in original'; (i.a.) or [...] = 'insertion added' may be used.
The full bibliographical details of sources are provided only once at the end of the manuscript under References. References in the body of the manuscript should follow the following convention: Mkhize (2017:14) argues .... or, at the end of a reference/quotation: .... (Ngwenya 2017:20f).
The surname and initials of authors as they appear in the source must be used in the References section.
Review articles and book reviews must include a title as well as the following information concerning the book reviewed: title, author, place of publication, publisher, date of publication, number of pages and the ISBN number.
In the text as well as the References, all book, journal, newspaper and magazine titles must be in italics.