An investigation of pedagogical change with novel technology in fee paying and no-fee schools during COVID 19
Abstract
Following the reopening of schools after the national lockdown in March 2020, the DBE implemented the School Reform Plan to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on loss of learning and teaching in schools. To date, limited information is available on the extent to which these measures have impacted on pedagogical practices of teachers across the different poverty quintile schools. This paper reports on teachers’ perceptions of how novel technological tools, introduced during the pandemic, altered their pedagogy practices across no-fee and fee-paying schools? Data was obtained from 1098 teachers and analysed using Cultural Historical Activity Theory as the framework. Findings indicate two broad, ideal pedagogical types that emerged in both no-fee and fee-paying schools from the use of technology into schools during COVID, reinforcement pedagogy and collaborative pedagogy. While reinforcement pedagogy is motivated by the need to cover the curriculum, collaborative pedagogy is motivated by the need to develop students’ understanding of concepts in class.
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first non-exclusive publication rights granted to Journal of Education. Authors agree that any subsequent publication of the article will credit the Journal as the site of first publication and provide a link to the Journal website. Authors contributing to Journal of Education agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, allowing third parties users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Note: Authors who may need to comply with the particular open access requirements of their funding bodies can apply to JoE for a more liberal licence, such as Creative Commons CC BY.