Crises and disruptions: Educational reflections, (re)imaginings, and (re)vitalization
COVID-19 has illuminated and exacerbated inequities, yet, as a crisis, it is not exceptional in its effect on
education. We start this critical essay by situating the crisis in its historical, economic, and political contexts,
illustrating how crisis and violence intersect as structural conditions of late modernity, capitalism, and their
education systems. Situating the current crisis contextually lays the foundation to analyse how it has been
interpreted through three sets of policy imaginaries, characterised by the notions of learning loss and building
back better and by solutions primarily based on techno-education. These concepts reflect and are reflective of
the international aid and development paradigm during the pandemic. Building on this analysis, we present, in
the final section, an alternative radical vision that calls on a sociology of possibilities and pedagogies of hope
that we see to be central to a new people-centred education imaginary to disrupt current inequalities and provide
a new way of doing rather than a return to a business-as-usual approach in and through education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first non-exclusive publication rights granted to Journal of Education. Authors agree that any subsequent publication of the article will credit the Journal as the site of first publication and provide a link to the Journal website. Authors contributing to Journal of Education agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, allowing third parties users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Note: Authors who may need to comply with the particular open access requirements of their funding bodies can apply to JoE for a more liberal licence, such as Creative Commons CC BY.