Knowledge and judgement for assessing student teaching: a cross-institutional analysis of teaching practicum assessment instruments
Teaching practicum (TP) assessment instruments provide insight into the nature of the
knowledge that the university expects university-appointed tutors and school-based
supervising teachers to have in order to make fair judgements about a student’s teaching
competence. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the TP assessment instruments
used during 2012 by five South African universities offering initial teacher education. It
describes the grounds upon which the comparative analysis was done, and offers a
qualitative analysis of the knowledge base that the assessors of student teaching are
assumed to have. We find that the structure and criteria of some TP assessment instruments
tend to construct the assessment of student teaching as straight-forward exercise in
verifying that certain technical requirements are met. In contrast, we show how others use
structure and criteria potentially to enable a more professionally based judgement of the
competence of student teaching
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first non-exclusive publication rights granted to Journal of Education. Authors agree that any subsequent publication of the article will credit the Journal as the site of first publication and provide a link to the Journal website. Authors contributing to Journal of Education agree to publish their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, allowing third parties users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear. Note: Authors who may need to comply with the particular open access requirements of their funding bodies can apply to JoE for a more liberal licence, such as Creative Commons CC BY.