Telerehabilitation: Current Challenges to Deployment in the United States

  • Jana Cason Spalding University, Louisville, Kentucky
  • Ellen R Cohn University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Keywords: telemedicine, telepractice, telerehabilitation, telehealth

Abstract

Telerehabilitation is the use of technology to deliver rehabilitation services when the patient and practitioner are in different physical locations. This commentary presents current challenges to the deployment of telerehabilitation in the United States: profession-centric nomenclature, limited efficacy research, inter-state license portability barriers, and inadequate reimbursement.

Author Biographies

Jana Cason, Spalding University, Louisville, Kentucky
Jana Cason, DHS, DHS, OTR/L, FAOTA is Associate Professor, Auerbach School of Occupational Therapy, Spalding University, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Ellen R Cohn, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Ellen R. Cohn PhD, CCC- SLP is Associate Dean for Instructional Development, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, and Professor, Department of Communication Science and Disorders. She is also Interim Director, Undergraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science.

References

American Telemedicine Association. (2012). What is telemedicine? Available at: http://www.americantelemed.org/learn/what-is-telemedicine accessed 3 June 2013.

BCC Research. (2012). Global markets for telemedicine technologies. Available at: http://www.bccresearch.com/report/telemedicine-technologies-global-markets-hlc014e.html accessed 3 June 2013.

Brennan D, Tindall L, Theodoros D, et al.. A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. Int J Telerehab 2010;2(2):31-34. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2010.6063.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2013). Telehealth position paper. Available at: http://www.aota.org/Practitioners/Official/Position/36203.aspx?FT=.pdf accessed 3 June 2013.

Forducey P, Ruwe W, Dawson S, et al.. Using telerehabilitation to promote TBI recovery and transfer of knowledge. NeuroRehab 2003;18(2):103–111.

Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Dennett L. Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17(6):281-287. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101208.

Kelso G, Fiechtl B, Olsen S, Rule S. The feasibility of virtual home visits to provide early intervention: a pilot study. Infants Young Child 2009;22(4):332-340.

Sanford JA, Griffiths PC, Richardson P, et al.. The effects of in-home rehabilitation on task self-efficacy in mobility-impaired adults: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54(11):1641-1648.

Sanford H, Hoenig H, Griffiths P, et al.. A comparison of televideo and traditional in-home rehabilitation in mobility impaired older adults. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2007;25(3):1-18.

Krumm M, Vento B. Applications in teleaudiology. In: Kumar S, Cohn E, editors. Telerehabilitation. London, Springer, 2013.

Vismara L, Young G, Stahmer A, Griffith EM, Rogers S. Dissemination of evidence-based practice: can we train therapists from a distance? J Autism Dev Disord 2009;39(12):1636-1651.

World Health Organization. (2003). WHO definition of health. Available at: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html accessed 3 June 2013.

World Health Organization, World Bank Group. World Report on Disability. Geneva, Switzerland, WHO Press, 2011.

Steel K, Cox D, Garry H. Therapeutic videoconferencing interventions for the treatment of long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17(3):109-117. doi:10.1258/jtt.2010.100318.

Lewis C, Packman A, Onslow M. A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention. Am J Speech-Lang Path 2008;17(2):139-149. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/014).

Tousignant M, Boissy P, Moffet H, et al.. Patients’ satisfaction of healthcare services and perception with in-home telerehabilitation and physiotherapists’ satisfaction toward technology for postknee arthroplasty: an embedded study in a randomized trial. Telemedicine J E-Health 2007;17(5):1-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0198.

Cohn E, Watzlaf JM. Privacy and Internet-based telepractice. Perspectives on Telepractice, ASHA 2011;1(1):26-37. doi: 10.1044/tele1.1.26.

Watzlaf V, Moeini, S, Firouzan P. VoIP for telerehabilitation: a risk analysis for privacy, security, and HIPAA compliance, Part I. Int J Telerehab 2010;2(2):3-14. doi 10.5195/ijt.2010.6056.

American Occupational Therapy Association. (2013). Telehealth ethics advisory. Available at: http://www.aota.org/Practitioners/Ethics/Advisory/52314.aspx?FT=.pdf accessed 3 June 2013.

Cohn E. Tele-ethics in telepractice for communication disorders. Perspectives on Telepractice. ASHA 2012;2(1): 3-15.

Cason J, Brannon JA. Telehealth regulatory and legal considerations: frequently asked questions. Int J Telerehab 2011;3(2):15-18. doi:10.5195/ijt.2011.6077.

Brannon JA, Cohn ER, Cason J. Making the case for uniformity in professional state licensure requirements. Int J Telerehab 2012;4(1):41-46.

Cohn ER, Brannon JA, Cason J. Resolving barriers to licensure portability for telerehabilitation professionals. Int J Telerehab 2011;3(2):31-34. doi:10.5195/ijt.2011.6078.

Health Resources and Services Administration. (2010). Health licensing board report to Congress. Available at: http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/about/telehealth/licenserpt10.pdf accessed 3 June 2013.

Federation of State Medical Boards. (2013). Federation of State Medical Boards to explore use of interstate compact for physician licensure. Available at: http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/fsmb_news_rrelease_multistate_compacts.pdf accessed 3 June 2013.

National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (2013). Model legislation & rules. Available at: https://www.ncsbn.org/2539.htm accessed 3 June 2013.

Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2013). Request for comments: draft proposal ASPPB E-passport. Available at: http://www.asppb.net/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3613 accessed 3 June 2013.

National Coalition on Care Coordination. (2010). Implementing care coordination in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Available at: http://www.nyam.org/social-work-leadership-institute/docs/publications/N3C-Implementing-Care-Coordination.pdf accessed 3 June 2013.

National Quality Forum. (2010). Quality connections: care coordination. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2010/10/Quality_Connections__Care_Coordination.aspx accessed 3 June 2013.

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml accessed 3 June 2013.

International Telecommunication Union. (2013). ITU report confirms: dramatic growth in data volumes and globalized services create new ICT regulatory challenges. Available at: http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2013/14.aspx accessed 3 June 2013.

Simpson J. Challenges and trends driving

telerehabilitation. In: Kumar S, Cohn E, editors. Telerehabilitation. London, Springer, 2013.

United Nations. (2013). CRPD and optional protocol signatures and ratifications. Available at: http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/maps/enablemap.jpg accessed 3 June 2013.

American Telemedicine Association. (2013). 2013 State telemedicine legislation tracking (as of 5/14/2013). Available at: http://www.americantelemed.org/docs/default-source/policy/state-telemedicine-legislation-matrix.pdf?sfvrsn=46 accessed 3 June 2013.

Published
2013-08-02
How to Cite
Cason, J., & Cohn, E. (2013). Telerehabilitation: Current Challenges to Deployment in the United States. Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and EHealth, 1(2), 73-77. Retrieved from https://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/JISfTeH/article/view/38
Section
Invited Commentary