A Reproducible and Standardised Clinical Registry for Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Patients

  • Patricia Spies Subutzki Py Hospital Samaritano de São Paulo – São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Roberto Sant’Anna Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul – Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Renato Kalil Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul – Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Marciane Rover Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul – Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
  • Clarissa Rodrigues Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul – Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Keywords: heart transplantation, quality indicators, registries, Brazil

Abstract

This study describes the creation and implementation of a prospective, reproducible and standardised clinical registry of outpatients who underwent heart transplantation.  Methods and Results: The following steps were carried out: i) data were standardised in accordance with national and international standard data elements, ii) an initial data collection and clinical research workflow was developed, iii) electronic case reports were developed in accordance with the HIPAA privacy rule using REDCap, iv) pilot testing and validation of the data collection, clinical research workflows and case report forms was undertaken, and v) an automated data quality report was developed using REDCap. All patients undergoing heart transplantation in a reference cardiology hospital were included. Patients were excluded if they did not agree to participate in the study. The registry was designed to become multicentre in the future. Data were collected from the moment of the inclusion (hospital admission), at hospital discharge, and 1, 3 and 6 months and yearly after surgery. Clinical and cost-related outcomes included all-causes mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospital admissions, visits to the emergency department, organ rejection, infection, need for re-operation, any adverse event, costs related to treatment and procedures, and quality of life.   Conclusions: This registry represents a powerful tool for assisting quality improvement, healthcare services management, technology assessment, health policies and clinical research since it contains comprehensive and representative data of the clinical practice and allows for interoperability and data integration with other datasets.

References

Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2012 update: a report from American Heart Association. Circulation 2012;125(1):e2-e220.

Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:e147-e239.

Bacal F, Souza-Neto JD, Fiorelli AI, et al. Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia. II Diretriz brasileira de transplante cardiaco. Arq Bras Cardiol 2009; 94(1suppl1):e16-e73.

Bocchi EA, Fiorelli A. First Guideline Group for Heart Transplantation of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology. The Brazilian experience with heart transplantation: a multicenter report. J Heart Lung Transplant 2001;20(6):637-645.

International Registry for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). (2016). Registries - Heart/Lung Registries. Available at: http://www.ishlt.org/registries/heartLungRegistry.asp accessed 16 January 2016.

Dwyer JS, Weaver A, Hughes K. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. In: Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Dwyer JS Security Issues in the Digital Medical Enterprise. Jamshedpur: Society for Computer Applications in Radiology, 2000;9-18.

Published
2017-08-20
How to Cite
Py, P., Sant’Anna, R., Kalil, R., Rover, M., & Rodrigues, C. (2017). A Reproducible and Standardised Clinical Registry for Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Heart Transplantation Patients. Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and EHealth, 5, (GKR);e40:(1-5). Retrieved from https://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/JISfTeH/article/view/270
Section
Global Telemedicine and eHealth Updates. Knowledge Resources. Vol. 10, 2017