The Evidence for the Economic Value of eHealth in the United States Today: A Systematic Review

  • Leslie Wilson University of California, San Francisco
  • Ashley Kim University of California, San Francisco
  • David Szeto University of California, San Francisco
Keywords: eHealth, telemedicine, cost-effectiveness, health economics, health outcomes

Abstract

The United States healthcare system continues to face increasing costs, with year-over-year projected cost increases that now exceed the rate of increase of the gross domestic product. The rapid expansion and integration of eHealth within the United States healthcare system is driven primarily by a perceived ability to increase access in a cost-efficient manner. However, there is little economic research that addresses the large diversity of eHealth products being integrated into this healthcare landscape. The goal of this study is to evaluate the published economic evidence for eHealth in the United States, analyse how well it supports the growth of the current eHealth environment, and suggest what evidence is needed. This systematic literature review, conducted through the PubMed and The Cochrane Library databases, found that few studies addressed today’s eHealth environment. The current landscape is broader and less tailored to the traditional telemedicine initiatives represented by existing studies. We suggest more rigour in the design and scope of economic studies and that current eHealth technologies be identified for analysis. These studies must be comprehensive from the healthcare system’s perspective and conducted for relevant initiatives and patient groups to allow for evidence-based discussions on the cost-effectiveness of eHealth.

References

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2016). NHE Fact Sheet. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nhe-fact-sheet.html accessed 22 September 2016.

Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 2001;3(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmr.3.2.e20.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009;6(7) e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force. Value Health 2013;16(2):231-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaborative®. Version 5.1.0, 2011.

Urquhart AC, Antoniotti NM, Berg RL. Telemedicine—an efficient and cost-effective approach in parathyroid surgery. Laryngoscope 2011;121(7):1422-1425. doi: 10.1002/lary.21812.

Canon S, Shera A, Patel A, Zamilpa I, Paddack J, Fisher PL, et al. A pilot study of telemedicine for post-operative urological care in children. J Telemed Telecare 2014;20(8):427-430. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14555610.

Anderson ER, Smith B, Ido M, Frankel M. Remote assessment of stroke using the iPhone 4. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22(4):340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.09.013.

Kim H, Spaulding R, Werkowitch M, et al. Costs of multidisciplinary parenteral nutrition care provided at a distance via mobile tablets. JPEN 2014;38(2 Suppl):50S-57S. doi: 10.1177/0148607114550692.

Morland LA, Raab M, Mackintosh MA, et al. Telemedicine: a cost-reducing means of delivering psychotherapy to rural combat veterans with PTSD. Telemed J E Health 2013;19(10):754-759. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0298.

Franzini L, Sail KR, Thomas EJ, Wueste L. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a telemedicine intensive care unit program in 6 intensive care units in a large health care system. J Crit Care 2011;26(3):329.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.12.004.

Hitt WC, Low G, Bird TM, Ott R. Telemedical cervical cancer screening to bridge medicaid service care gap for rural women. Telemed J E Health 2013;19(5):403-408. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0148.

Pyne JM, Fortney JC, Tripathi SP, Maciejewski ML, Edlund MJ, Williams DK. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a rural telemedicine collaborative care intervention for depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67(8):812-821. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.82.

Demaerschalk BM, Switzer JA, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost utility of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks from societal perspective. Am J Manag Care 2013;19(2):976-985.

Switzer JA, Demaerschalk BM, Xie J, Fan L, Villa KF, Wu EQ. Cost-effectiveness of hub-and-spoke telestroke networks for the management of acute ischemic stroke from the hospitals’ perspectives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2013;6(1):18-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967125.

Nelson RE, Saltzman GM, Skalabrin EJ, Demaerschalk BM, Majersik JJ. The cost-effectiveness of telestroke in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2011;77(17):1590-1598. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318234332d.

Yoo BK, Kim M, Sasaki T, Melnikow J, Marcin JP. Economic Evaluation of Telemedicine for Patients in ICUs. Crit Care Med 2016;44(2):265-274.

United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2016). Population & Migration: Overview. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/population-migration.aspx accessed 1 August 2016.

Brady CJ, Villanti AC, Gupta OP, Graham MG, Sergott RC. Tele-ophthalmology screening for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in urban primary care offices: an economic analysis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2014;45(6):556-561. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20141118-11.

Li Z, Wu C, Olayiwola JN, Hilaire DS, Huang JJ. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy. Conn Med 2012;76(2):85-90.

Palmas W, Shea S, Starren J, et al. Medicare payments, healthcare service use, and telemedicine implementation costs in a randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in medically underserved participants with diabetes mellitus (IDEATel). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17(2):196-202. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002592.

Butler TN, Yellowlees P. Cost analysis of store-and-forward telepsychiatry as a consultation model for primary care. Telemed J E Health 2012;18(1):74-77. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0086

Fortney JC, Maciejewski ML, Tripathi SP, Deen TL, Pyne JM. A budget impact analysis of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression. Med Care 2011;49(9):872-880. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821d2b35.

Soran OZ, Feldman AM, Piña IL, et al. Cost of medical services in older patients with heart failure: those receiving enhanced monitoring using a computer-based telephonic monitoring system compared with those in usual care: the heart failure home care trial. J Card Fail 2010;16(11):859-866. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.05.028.

Fishman PA, Cook AJ, Anderson ML, et al. Improving BP control through electronic communications: an economic evaluation. Am J Manag Care 2013;19(9):709-716.

Kirkizlar E, Serban N, Sisson JA, Swann JL, Barnes CS, Williams MD. Evaluation of telemedicine for screening of diabetic retinopathy in the Veterans Health Administration. Ophthalmology 2013;120(12):2604-2610. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.06.029.

Published
2016-10-23
How to Cite
Wilson, L., Kim, A., & Szeto, D. (2016). The Evidence for the Economic Value of eHealth in the United States Today: A Systematic Review. Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and EHealth, 4, e21 (1-20). Retrieved from https://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/JISfTeH/article/view/175
Section
Reviews